However, Ext3 lacks advanced file system features like extent blocking mapping, dynamic allocation inode, and defragmentation. Ext4 is also a journaling file system that was a series of backward-compatible extensions to Ext3.
It is the file system for most Linux distributions. Besides, Ext4 is supported by some other operating systems, including Windows read and write with ext2fsd , FreeBSD version It was initially included in Linux Kernel version 2. In addition, it comes with the Extents that is a replacement of traditional block mapping used by Ext2 and Ext3, which improves large-file performance and reduces fragmentation.
Since Ext4 is backward compatible with Ext2 and Ext3, you can mount them as Ext4 for better performance. Ext4 utilizes the Delayed allocation technology that makes sure data can be flushed to disk timely. Thus, a large amount of data can be allocated effectively at a time. Another advantage is that Ext4 has no limit in the number of subdirectories in a single directory, while the subdirectories in Ext3 are limited to Well, the Ext4 file system has some limitations as well.
In addition, the Delayed allocation feature could trigger potential data loss when a system crash or power failure occurs before the data has been written to disk. After reading the above information, I believe that you already have known the answer.
Ext2 vs Ext3 vs Ext4: which one should you use? A lot of people are still confused about this question. If you are not sure, the Ext4 file system is an ideal choice. At present, Ext4 is the default file system for most Linux distributions including Debian and Ubuntu.
It provides more flexibility for storing large files and boasts more advanced features than the other two extended file systems. In addition, Ext4 was designed to be backward compatible. Each FAT variant can divide a drive into an increasing number of clusters and supports an increasing maximum file size and volume size. For example FAT12 supported a maximum file and volume size of 32 megabytes, meanwhile FAT32 can store individual files up to 4 gigabytes in size and is limited to 32 gigabyte volumes if formatted in Windows, up to 2 terabytes when formatted with other operating systems, and has an absolute maximum volume size of 16 terabytes.
FAT32 remains a popular filesystem due to its high level of compatibility across operating systems and is still widely used to format USB flash drives, memory cards and some other external storage devices.
It was introduced in to overcome the limitations of FAT32 and has a file size limit of 16 exabytes an exabyte is 1 million terabytes, so in practice with no file size constraint. NTFS is also a journaling file system which means that it maintains a record of changes, so it can recover following a system crash or power failure. For these reasons all modern versions of Windows must be installed on a drive which is NTFS formatted.
The only real downside of NTFS is a lack of compatibility with older versions of Windows and non-Windows operating systems. For example, by default NTFS volumes are read-only in Mac OS and in older Linux distros, and may not be readable at all on other devices such as standalone media players.
Like this post? Please share to your friends:. Ubuntu is a complete Linux operating system, freely available with both community and professional. Press the Windows logo on your keyboard, or click the Windows icon in the. If you have a Ford model. Discussion threads can be closed at any time at our discretion. Topher Kessler. June 22, a. Since the Linux OS will be the most compatible option for reading such a drive format, the first methods include simply installing Linux and using it as the filesystem management interface: Install Linux to a secondary drive If you have a secondary drive in your system or have partitioned your primary drive, you can install Linux to this drive and dual boot your computer.
This will be the most compatible option for reading an Ext2 or Ext3 drive, but will also require you use a common filesystem format ie, FAT32 as a transfer intermediary between the Linux and OS X installations.
0コメント